Abductive Reasoning in Environmental Decision Support Systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
Decision trees and rule-based system including variants based on propositional and fuzzy logic have been the method of choice in many applications of environmental decision support systems. Reasons are the ease of use, the capability of representing uncertainty, and the fast computation of results at runtime when using decision trees or other similar means for knowledge representation. Unfortunately there are drawbacks related with these modeling paradigms. For example, the cause-effect relationships between quantities are not captured correctly. The resulting model is well appropriated for a certain purpose but can hardly be re-used. Moreover, maintaining the knowledge base can be an intricate task. In this paper we focus on the problems related with decision trees in the context of environmental decision support systems using an example from the domain. We further present abductive reasoning as an alternative for modeling and show how these technique can be easily implemented using existing techniques.
منابع مشابه
On the Use of Abduction as an Alternative to Decision Trees in Environmental Decision Support Systems
Although decision trees are frequently used in environmental decision support systems, they have shortcomings. In the case of an available model, decision trees have to be constructed manually from the model. Moreover, not all knowledge is represented in the decision tree. To overcome this issue, the author proposes the use of abductive reasoning directly applied to the available cause-effect m...
متن کاملOn the Use of Abduction as an Alternative to Decision Trees in Environmental Decision Support Systems
Although decision trees are frequently used in environmental decision support systems, they have shortcomings. In the case of an available model, decision trees have to be constructed manually from the model. Moreover, not all knowledge is represented in the decision tree. To overcome this issue, the author proposes the use of abductive reasoning directly applied to the available cause-effect m...
متن کاملOn the Use of Abduction as an Alternative to Decision Trees in Environmental Decision Support Systems
Although decision trees are frequently used in environmental decision support systems, they have shortcomings. In the case of an available model, decision trees have to be constructed manually from the model. Moreover, not all knowledge is represented in the decision tree. To overcome this issue, the author proposes the use of abductive reasoning directly applied to the available cause-effect m...
متن کاملOn the Use of Abduction as an Alternative to Decision Trees in Environmental Decision Support Systems
Although decision trees are frequently used in environmental decision support systems, they have shortcomings. In the case of an available model, decision trees have to be constructed manually from the model. Moreover, not all knowledge is represented in the decision tree. To overcome this issue, the author proposes the use of abductive reasoning directly applied to the available cause-effect m...
متن کاملReconstructing Causal Reasoning about Evidence: a Case Study
When procedural-support systems are to be useful in practice, they should provide support for causal reasoning about evidence. Such support should be both rationally well-founded and natural to the users of such systems. This article studies two possible foundations for such support, logics for defeasible argumentation and logical models of causal-abductive reasoning. A court decision about a c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2009